Feeds:
Posts
Comments

Posts Tagged ‘john holdren’

“The fetus, given the opportunity to develop properly before birth, and given the essential early socializing experiences and sufficient nourishing food during the crucial early years after birth, will ultimately develop into a human being.”

John Holdren, U.S. Science Czar (quoted on Glenn Beck tonight)

Pro-lifers have been saying it until they’re blue in the face: if you can kill the unborn, then nobody is safe, and there is no logical cut-off to when you can kill the baby.  Child abuse and murder have skyrocketed: pro-lifers have pointed out that, if you can kill the baby in the womb right up to birth, then what really changed five minutes, or five months, after birth?  Are any of us safe?

The Science Czar doesn’t seem to think that the scientific evidence argues for humanity until, well… at some point.

Apparently, we have gotten so blase about the abortion murders in our midst, it is now ok to be completely out in the open about the lack of humanity for some time after birth.  Some of the more radical thinkers in this direction argue for “human” criteria including independence, ability to be self-sustaining, etc.  Well, good grief, I said (yelling at the tv, as usual), my brother didn’t fulfill those criteria until about 23 years old!

Others say that the infant doesn’t *count* because they don’t understand tomorrow, long-term plans, etc.  Does that mean that people with mental disabilities are the next on the list?  What about the elderly who develop dementia or Alzheimer’s?  Combine that with the graph from Dr. Ezekiel Emanuel, where infants and those over 55 are drastically less likely to receive health care “intervention” if there is any kind of shortage.

Oh, no, no, we aren’t going to kill your grandma, President Obama told us.

Now, if she needs too much medicine, we might just let her die.  But that’s totally different, right?

Several public pundits scoffed that, oh, that ditzy Sarah Palin is totally out to lunch when she warns about “death panels” deciding whether or not her elderly parents or child with Downs will get health care.

But a child with a major disability can’t really expect that we’ll waste money on him when we could be curing more useful teenagers, now can he?  So we won’t euthenize him, but we won’t do anything to avoid his death or improve his life, either.

When Queen Elizabeth was persecuting the Catholics in England through punitive taxes, prohibitions on education and certain employments, etc., she insisted she was just doing it for the sake of England’s stability.  (Never mind that most English were still Catholic until the Gunpowder Plot in 1605, after Elizabeth’s death.)  Of course, people resisted.  Many were arrested and sent to prison.  Not executed, of course: we don’t want to make martyrs… just left in putrid water in the prisons up to their waists until they rotted alive and eventually died.  The Queen didn’t actually execute them… technically…

Anybody feel safer yet?

Read Full Post »

Over the centuries, many people have noted that there are no new ideas.  Even our sins, which we vainly imagine are ours or are somehow new and creative, are only endless repeats.  Truth is endless in variety, but heresy continues to repeat.

A Protestant friend was struggling with the Trinity, which some more-sola-scriptura-than-thou type had pointed out was a word not used in the Bible, and the idea was a little vaguely explained.  He argued that the Trinity should be understood more as aspects of God, since God is One.  My friend was getting very confused.  Oh, look, modalism again.

A Latin-only Catholic friend argued that Mary didn’t really give birth to Jesus, that she only saw him in a vision and reached out and picked him up.  She only appeared to give birth.  Giving birth was just too… icky, unfit for God, or something (like poopy diapers were better?).  Been there, argued that before: docetism.

By far the most popular heresy, even today, however, seems to be a variety of Manicheanism called Albigensianism.  It argued that there were, in fact, two Gods: the good one created spirit and the bad one created matter.  Hence, the goal of the good Albigensian was to “free” the soul from the body: suicide was encouraged.  Since the body was bad, having children was an evil.  Marriage was wrong, since it encouraged a permanent relationship that might lead not only to sex, but children; concubinage, being temporary, was preferable.  (Somehow, Fox’s Book of Martyrs (popped up online) sees them as proto-Protestants, and just another example of the attempts of “popery” to stamp out “true Christians.”  With true Christians like this, who needs heretics?)

So, why am I saying American is succumbing to Albigensianism?

Well, the tipping point was the new Science Czar, John Holdren, and the recent comments of outgoing Supreme Court Justice Ruth Bader Ginsburg (hat tip to Lindy for the Malkin article).  Apparently, Holdren co-authored a book with population control adovocate Paul Ehrlich, who wrote The Population Bomb, which direly warned of mass starvation by the 1980′s unless drastic measures were taken to reduce the human population.  (I was pretty young in the 80′s, and my parents were far from rich, but I don’t seem to remember starving.)  (If you’re wondering, Ehrlich learned how to make these great predictions about human population growth from studying butterflies.  Sort of like how Dr. Alfred Kinsey became the great human sex “expert” of the 60′s by studying wasps.)

Anyways, Holdren co-authored the book Eco-Science with Paul Ehrlich and his wife, Anne Ehrlich.  In it, the three advocated forced sterilization, “insemination” only by permission, research into the possibility of adding contraceptives to the water supply (congratulations on one correct prediction: the leftover synthetic estrogens from millions of women drugged on the Pill have started affecting our fertility already), and strict limits to the number of children a woman would be allowed to have.  Granted, that was 1977, but Holder still touts the book on his list of accomplishments. (The New York Times, predictably, is more upset by the nomination to director of the NIH of someone who wrote a book on his conversion to Christianity.  At the Times, Christians are scary, but eugenists are nothing surprising.)

Continuing the hysteria, now that the population bomb seems to have been largely defused, Holdren turned to predicting massive ecological disasters that would wipe out billions before 2020 or a thirteen foot sea-level rise by 2010 (considering that he said that last one in 2006, I suppose I should expect to suddenly have a house on an island by Christmas this year…).

So much for “taking religion out of science policy;” Holdren looks to be of the same category as the guy on the street corner with the Bible open to the Apocalypse and a sign warning, “THE END IS NEAR!”

Meanwhile, Justice Ginsburg commented on Roe vs. Wade, saying that

Frankly I had thought that at the time Roe was decided, there was concern about population growth and particularly growth in populations that we don’t want to have too many of…

Ok, so, as a Jew, Justice Ginsburg is ok with the thought that she had relatives (maybe even grandparents?) in Europe during WWII who were a “population we don’t want too many of” and marked for extermination?  Maybe I shouldn’t be surprised; Margaret Sanger, founder of Planned Parenthood, once said that the best thing a family can do for their fourth child is kill it… in spite of the fact that she was the sixth of her parents’ eleven children.

I understand that the Culture of Death is inherently suicidal, on a philosophical level, in the long term, but it is amazing how little digging you have to do to find it.

 

Which brings us back to the Albigensians.

Today, we don’t do it for the worship of the “Good God”.  We do it for the worship of Gaia/nature/greenness.

Marriage is discouraged, sleeping around is preferred: fewer kids and entanglements to distract from worship of the latest green initiatives or yourself.

Having kids is evil (especially if it’s your second or, like OMG!, your third).

Suicide is encouraged.  Euthenasia is becoming legal in more and more states; it is already well-entrenched in Europe, which is becoming particularly expert at suicide, given their abysmally low birth rates.  If the “death with dignity” people don’t get them, demographics will.  If nationalized health care passes in the U.S., “dignity” will be dropped and the word of the day will be “rationing,” as in, “You’re too old to spend this much money on.  Please contact your local suicide center or at least have the decency to die quickly and stop consuming resources.”  It’s already started in several states.

 

While fighting the Albigensian heresy, the Church was not only fighting against doctrinal error, but against the end of the human race.  Only, today, we don’t call them “heretics”.  Most people, immersed in eco-propaganda in the public school system and from the media for decades say, “Yeah, well, maybe they’ve got a point…” and carelessly sign the death warrants on their children by looking the other way.

Read Full Post »

Follow

Get every new post delivered to your Inbox.

Join 29 other followers